Tag Archives: ufo contactees

Becoming Fearless to Bridge Worlds

Fearlessness – Overcoming Dystopian Thoughts

I’ve been involved in overcoming fears and transcending them to be fearless, dealing with ‘others’ in various scenarios, for most of my life. I’ve had three decades of considerable engagement in Ufology, learning to be fearless, long before most of the folks today even had a clue of what was going on. I love the newcomers who’ve had an experience or even a few and want to beat people up sharing them.

Generally early experiencers, and even a lot of materialist/scientist types in the field, have no idea about the depths of consciousness and focus on the details of the events instead. Decades later they’ll have a different perspective for sure. It’s possible I’m stuck inside a paradigm, too, though my profession as a partnering facilitator calls me to always engage multiple POVs simultaneously, aligning them toward meeting project milestones in multi-million dollar contracts.

Continuing to think in the paradigm that creates an ‘us vs. them’ is a choice, right? That makes it subjective. When are we going to pull out heads out of our assess and realize it is our choice to continue to create the paradigm. The thing is that disclosure doesn’t mean a damn thing when it comes to addressing the bigger issues of our planetary civilization.

Considering Our Focus

We are so focused outside that we turn on ourselves and forget the inner needs and requests of our ‘mentors’ to learn how to get along. Claiming the elites want to thwart disclosure seems counter-intuitive, really. They face the same challenges we do as a planetary civilization. They don’t have ways for achieving an exodus to the Moon or Mars.

Here’s a question, though. Are we one? If we are then we can view things from that place of oneness and inquire as to what we might be able to observe as indicators, right? Is that being stuck inside one paradigm? All things considered, it seems to be a quantum view from a unified field perspective. Isn’t that where we’re headed?

There’s a guy that once said, “The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on building the new.”If you believe I have experience and knowledge, then maybe there is a different reason for my comments than you assumed. To launch into citing global warming, nuclear proliferation and wealth disparities had nothing to do with the comment. It was solely about how we think in fear-based terms and don’t realize it until someone comments on the obvious.

My point was that we need to eliminate the projections of the elites being afraid, or anyone being afraid for that matter. That’s a subjective perspective. If we are going to acknowledge that consciousness has a part in this and that quantum applications apply, then attention, intention and action is absolutely critical – where we put our thoughts is imperative to creating a movement. Starting out with an us vs. them attitude is so last century.

People rise to meet your view of them. Students thought to be gifted (even when they weren’t) performed at gifted levels because the teacher was told they were gifted students. I taught a class of exceptional students (low end of the spectrum) and they performed better than they imagined they could when given a research project. Why can’t we do that with cohorts, peers and others?

Is There a Consistent Message?

Most of the folks in Ufology are still stuck in a fear-based paradigm and tend to war with each other instead of trying to understand each other and grow together. Experiencers are telling others to shift their thinking to fearlessness, even harmony, and offering ways to do so. We’re being nurtured into a new living awareness but assumptions and projections certainly diminish that capacity for change.

Many if not most still point at the old paradigm. Things have changed. Today, or just recently, we’ve had more open talk about the reality than ever before, like Michio Kaku’s statements, let alone his attendance, at the World UFO Congress. Pilots aren’t threatened anymore. Even government officials are speaking up, so why continue to live in the past?

A friend offered this in response to a statement I made, though from the tone of the post this response was an inadvertent truth. “Expanding human consciousness in order to embrace a sense of oneness, a sense of unity between all life in the cosmos, is one a major theme that contact experiencers describe emerging from their interactions with UAP intelligences.” That is my point. I’ve stated that, but apparently that was missed.

Thoughts Regarding Disclosure

Many are pushing an agenda for governmental disclosure that they’ve known of our visitors for some time, and perhaps their purpose. Disclosure, imho, doesn’t have anything to do with the underlying activity or learning how to get along and work together toward collaborative solutions for our People and Planet. Please tell me how it does. I’m certainly open to consideration. Do UAP intelligences seem all that interested in Disclosure? It doesn’t seem so to me.

They continue to interact with those able and willing, right? What’s changed? There has been an ongoing process. It seems that UAPs or UFOs or whatever term we choose to label them with are flying about, attracting attention and having at least some communication with earthlings regarding their purpose here. The overwhelming majority of experiencers state it is a beneficent objective. Help is offered, only if we turn our attention on helping each other.

Is it possible that the elites don’t know anything more than the majority of the experiencers who have regular contact and conversations? Is it possible there are many experiencers who are working on solutions and don’t care to share they are experiencers? Choosing to confront or even discredit my assertions don’t make them false. Most folks are just so uncomfortable that instead of consideration there is immediate denial.

The reason I say disclosure doesn’t mean a damn thing is because the planetary civilization is responsible for their own changes and admitting we’re being visited doesn’t have anything to do with addressing the real issues. It should, in fact, get us to look at how our guests see us. What kind of house are we keeping? Who in Ufology are working with organizations or scientists looking for solutions to global problems? Those are our true compatriots.

In my entire history in this field, and others professionally, I’ve stressed the ‘message’ of needing to learn to work together, even provided platforms for folks to example it. I’ve personally invited dozens to do so on UfologyPress, even set them up with author accounts. Has anyone participated, even if only to show their desire for solidarity? NO. My intent is simply to offer help, to actualize what others are only talking about; the collaboration of cohorts.

It’s possible the I’m not a ‘valued’ figure in Ufology or part of the ‘in’ crowd that has everyone’s attention. I’ve attempted to garner some attention, proposed presentations, and even with personal relationship there has been no acceptance or invitation to be part of the speaker cohort. I do have some tested methods for creating contact without having to find secluded areas to do CE-5 events. A serendipitous event, a request to meditated to some music I helped produce, brought that into reality and further trials demonstrated its validity. 

That being said it is still an intended hopeful to bridge fields, to cross-reference similar understandings and to make sense common to the point of actual collaborative efforts toward harmony among people and planet, a sustainability we can only reach through cooperation. We first need to take a good hard look at our behavior and intentions.

I’m reminded of the Wall coming down and one of my favorite bands of all time celebrating its anniversary with a tribute to both David Bowie and our ability to remove the walls across the gamut of national or international boundaries. It needs fearlessness in doing so, regardless of who is leading the way. Are our intentions to create a new world order of harmony among people and planet? What are we allowing to be distractions to that end?

Awakening – Getting Through the Illusions We Face

Are We Waking Up?

“Awakening is not a matter of intelligence. Many intelligent people are deep in illusion. But rather, awakening happens when one has an insatiable thirst to know the truth.” Author Unknown

Awakening or illusion? How that insatiable thirst dispels the illusion depends on how awake we choose to be and the willingness to suspend or slice away false belief systems. We have to test them first, of course. Recycling memories tends to offer new insights and thoughts for me. Perhaps they’ll be interesting to you as the stream of consciousness flows onto the page. Putting thoughts to writing can be so cathartic.

What is truth? We refer to it, but do we ever really define it so that we can agree on it? I mean, truth would be ubiquitous and undeniable, right? I suppose, in a way, that might be a clear explanation of how we work, how we relate to each other, how we relate to the world or worlds we may perceive? Perhaps a combination of a mathematical and psycho-spiritual model that would explain the intelligence at work throughout? What is awakening related to this?

What would it do if we knew it? How would our lives look if we not only knew it, but lived it? Would you say that within this insatiable thirst there is a new living awareness that emerges? What is that like? Does it make sense? Is that sense being made common?

This emerging awareness seems completely subjective in the discovery process. Attempts to articulate a multi-dimensional funnel of data into linear ears and eyes has been going on for millennia. Alas, we still tend to argue about the details and miss the overarching message(s). Can the insatiable curiosity in many cause an upwising in the world? Big T, little t, it’s ultimately the same, so what is your concept of truth?

Well, that got a little deeper than intended. On a more practical note, it sure seems that this theme runs across a plethora of playing fields in our present time. The information age and data available for searching is causing an evolution in intelligence across the world. It would seem only logical that the ability to discern would also reach new levels in our lives.

Awakening – Illusion

Once we find this ‘whatever we’re looking for’ truth, the mere acquisition of it might make it suspicious at first. It’s natural. We’re always confused by the unknown suddenly becoming known, which it would seem is how the process of discovering truth works. Applying that to the field of Ufology is no small task. It’s hard to cut through the din.

There is a lot of concern voiced by many regarding the ‘experts’ in the field and the way in which they are promoted, or not as the case may be. There are numerous questions flying around social media platforms in the hundreds of groups that are aligned under the Ufology banner. They range from the absurd to the transformational in scope.

It’s fairly easy to spot the absurd or pejorative and dismiss them as just uninformed or experientially bereft. Then there are those who have great stories and no real proof, yet are followed by thousands or possibly millions across the web. Let us not forget the researchers who have done a great job at collecting and sharing information, though they tend to speculate about potentials based on incomplete data; experiencers are left out of the loop.

It’s been less than a decade since experiencers, en masse, have started sharing their stories through blogs, groups, pages, podcasts and web chats. Less than 20 years ago when the curator first dove into the web, there were extremely small numbers of folks willing to expose themselves to scrutiny. Spirit Web was big then, a chat platform with multiple rooms and topics. Today, the scene is prolific with thousands of opportunities to engage on hundreds of platforms.

The Aerial Phenomena Research Organization started in Sturgeon Bay, WI in 1952 and moved to Tucson, AZ in 1960. The National UFO Conference began in 1963 in Hollywood, of course. MUFON, Inc. was originally established as the Midwest UFO Network on 31 May 1969, in Quincy, Illinois. The conference craze began emerging in the early 1990s with the first International UFO Congress in Tucson, then Tim Beckley’s New Age and Alien Agenda conferences. The Prophets Conferences were big in the mid to late-90s, the curator managed their Phoenix event in 1997. Whole Life Expos began around the same time, too.  An ex-board member of WLE started Contact in the Desert, another profitable venture, in 2013. 

Awakening the Fray

Now there are dozens of Ufology-focused events around the world, most of which can be found on our website as we become aware of them. It is a niche market for sure, yet it has its celebrities and movie stars, just like the old days. Just how those celebrities are made is another perplexing question as there are many agendas spiraling within the field; some glaring and some a little less detectable at first. There are those who genuinely admit they don’t know much, though they have managed to gather enough data and some objective views on the subjective experiences of others.

We tend to listen and nod our heads to the experts of pretty much any field because we rarely understand what they are actually saying, especially the Ph.D.s, yet we don’t want to appear stupid to our peers by asking questions. Those who do have the experience and/or intelligence to ask questions are generally felt to be critical instead of sincere. Intelligent questions get glossed over or unanswered and tend to throw up those BS meter flags, or at least they should.

We certainly do not have all the answers, and maybe not even the questions yet. We still need that insatiable thirst for truth. We’ve had a materialist quest for truth with evidence, exotic metals, photos, ship remnants; material proof of some kind. We have only asked cursory questions regarding the occupants of the crafts we either have seen or trust that are there. The questions cannot be asked because the experiencers have not been let into the game.

Like any process and reflective of the field in general, there are some pretty strange tales and loud mouths in the experiencer groups, too. There are some consistencies, though, however small, that might be a good place to start asking questions. The quest for truth, at any level, is humbling beyond imagination. The small voices who seem genuine and sincere may hold some deeper truths about our relationship with the other planetary civilizations who frequent here.

Humans are resilient, resourceful and even reverent toward challenges in chaos and turmoil. We show as a human race that we can unify to overcome them and restore order. We do it all the time, yet somehow get distracted when it comes to the onslaught of information, personalities and pundits who manage the gate. There are some new developments within the field that are leaning toward incorporating experiencer data and philosophies on contact.

The key for the expansion and potential unification of this field is in collaboration with intention to keep the attention on asking better questions. Like Einstein claims, we cannot answer the questions with our own thinking, yet it is our option to be open to new thinking that allows the flow of information. Many have events where they speak things they did not understand prior to speaking about them in that moment. There is a conduit for information flow within us.

What does that have to do with the insatiable thirst for truth? That flow is what quenches the thirst. It’s like the elixir that resonates throughout our body/mind/spirit/soul to the degree of which we feel ‘electric’ or ‘energized’ or even ‘on fire’ with this discovery. That is the awakening of the conduit within us. It brings humility, not arrogance; compassion, not surreptitiousness. As curator and partial purveyor of profundities, we can all work together to restore order, the most profound truth of all.

Like this article?
Leave a tip!





(We use PayPal but you don’t need an account with PayPal.)

 

New Reference Material – Beyond UFOs

Beyond UFOs: The Science of Consciousness and…

For several years now, data has been collected and correlated by a dedicated group of folks under the banner of the Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial Experiences (FREE). The organization, like many, has gone through some iterations and changed to Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experiences, although they haven’t added an ‘E.’ Their surveys are directed toward contactees or ‘experiencers’ of this phenomena.

From their website: “BEYOND UFOS: THE SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND CONTACT WITH NON HUMAN INTELLIGENCE”.  After 4 years of conducting the world’s first comprehensive multi-language and international academic research study on UFO related Contact with Non Human Intelligence (NHI), The FREE Foundation has finally published its new book!

From a promotional email:

FREE is in the 5th year of administering the world’s first comprehensive, multi-language worldwide academic research study on individuals that have had Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) related contact experiences with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)–   The FREE Experiencer Research Study.

The Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experiences, or FREE, is a 501c3 not for profit academic research foundation. FREE was co-founded by the late Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Harvard University Astrophysicist Dr. Rudy Schild, Australian researcher Mary Rodwell, and Rey Hernandez, an attorney, a UAP Contact Experiencer, and Ph.D. candidate at UC Berkeley. Over the last 5 years, the FREE Foundation has had over 10 Ph.D.s, mostly retired academic professors, and 20 other lay researchers, volunteering in this research study. FREE’s Executive Director is Dr. Rudy Schild, a retired Astrophysicist from Harvard University.

Due to the controversial nature of the FREE research data, the UAP-related contact phenomenon is not studied in universities.  Even the field of “Parapsychology” continues to view the UAP contact phenomena as a taboo topic and the majority within parapsychology do not want to be directly associated with the UAP phenomenon.  FREE’s academic research study seeks to address this problem.  Until we began our research, no one had a basic understanding on the topic of UAP-related contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI). Why? Because the basic research data collection on this topic was never undertaken.  We discovered that many of our survey findings contradict much of what has been circulating in the field of Ufology. The true story of UAP-related contact with Non-Human Intelligence was not being accurately presented. FREE’s work is thus a paradigm-shifting event.

As you will soon observe from our data, FREE’s research suggests that the physical aspects of this phenomenon are but a small fraction of attributes associated with these complex manifestations. Indeed, it is the pervasive non-physicality, the parapsychological and other paranormal aspects, that comprise the majority of survey respondents’ experiences.

What can we do with all this data? Now, nearly 5 years later after the concerted effort to develop the surveys and distill the information into usable forms there is an obvious revelation in not only are these encounters real, they are much more prevalent than previously thought. Thousands of events have gone into the compilation of the statistics in order to share the relationships. No where else has this been accomplished yet. This volume is a requirement for any serious ufology research and anyone interested in the evolution of our consciousness and interaction with that which is beyond human.

The contributors to the book also share nearly the same views from their observations and research, let alone their personal experiences, presenting their ideas from a variety of perspectives that meet the scholarly requirements for a great work and leading-edge research in what has traditionally been a hands-off fashion for lack of empirical data and/or repeatable event construction. The nature of these encounters is certainly more random yet perhaps as the information is shared and studied there will be better questions that help us to understand and even participate in the phenomena.

If you are here and reading this, then you owe it to yourself to get the book.


Ka Gold Jewelry - Genesa Crystal

Like this article?
Leave a tip!





(We use PayPal but you don’t need an account with PayPal.)

 

Emergence And The Quest For Extraterrestrial Understanding

Is the underlying phenomena that drive UFOlogy an emergent phenomenon? Is it created from singular parts with an illusion of a whole? Is it only real when looked at from a certain perspective? Is something in our common human experience now exerting new experiences and phenomena?

Is the source of all those fantastical UFO sightings off world vehicular constructions of a type unknown. Or is it more ephemeral, more ethereal, and all too human of a thing? Must consciousness be considered? What does that even mean?

We are in dark territory surrounded by black water on this one.

To describe an emergent phenomenon, we must assume that emergent phenomena exist objectively, which in the case of UFOlogy is a foregone conclusion. Mathematics and the logic that flows from it are key. When we say that a phenomenon is emergent, what we really mean (without knowing it) is that a phenomenon is emergent within some perceptual modality or experience. Without perception, a map or scope of some set of information is simply another set of information. Nothing ’emerges’, there is only data compression. No labeling scheme requires that we resort to extra-mathematical ’emergent’ properties just because such properties seem to accomplish labeling so efficiently in hindsight.

When we run a query on a database and return a row of data, we would not consider the sum of that data to be a macrostate which has emerged from microstates. To ’emerge’ we would need to invoke some kind of phenomenal sensory quality, such as a visual graph. Even then, it would only seem emergent if the graph appeared automatically like a chemical precipitate from the data. In reality what allows us to see an image based on data in a computer is not any software or math, it is not a computation at all, but rather a physical transduction from semiconductor to optical physics to neurochemistry to phenomenology. We can see, for instance, how a bunch of ball bearings would have the emergent phenomena similar to a lubricant, but no matter what scale monochrome pixels are viewed at, no color would emerge. The brain as a whole is on a different scale than neurons or ion channels, but no scale is any more logically likely to precipitate a feeling or flavor than any other.

For this reason, Emergence should not be considered an objective feature to be described by mathematics or logic, but rather it is an aesthetic feature which is grounded in awareness. Emergence is not coupled to some disembodied parameter called ‘scope’, instead, it is the direct presentation of the scoping qualities of consciousness which gives the impression of emergence. It may be more of a ‘divergence’ than an Emergence, as our senses may serve to filter out experiential phenomena subtractively as much as they construct sensations from physical microstates. Macrostates are no less real than microstates, and both are emergent ‘scopes’ within consciousness.

We Are Forever Disjointed. The map is not the territory.

Count Alfred Korzybski used this Structural Differential (image) to drive home his point that the map of a territory is not the territory. His book: Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics drove the point home with a vengeance. At an early age, his book introduced me to the semantic confusion that results when abstractions are confused with their associated physical objects.

Mathematical models of phenomena never replicate all of the features of the physical manifestation of the phenomena. Models select a subset of the observables of the phenomena and approximate their quantitative relationships. Endless arguments could be avoided except for confusion about the reality of these abstractions.

Phenomena itself is directly unreachable because whatever the phenomenon is, we can only access it by what it does. This includes observations, sounds, and even mathematical models. But the conglomerate of these expressions, both physical and symbolic, results in something we can circle and point to, that we can name and refer to, and then call upon to remember and think about.

All evidence is an expression. All expression is potential evidence.

To be less abstract:

We see something because it does what it needs to be seen. It emits or reflects photons.

We hear something because it does what it needs to be heard. It shakes and generates sound waves.

We feel something because it does what it needs to be felt. It carries weight.

And similarly,

We model something because it behaves in ways that can be mathematically modeled. It carries logical consistency.
Phenomena are the expressions of evidence with mathematical expressions being no exception.

The best we can do is rank expressions by their abstractness and their distances from their source. Math is more abstract than direct observation. But there is always a distance. Hence, they are equated, if for the only reason that they never meet. From molecules to atoms to quarks to strings, every time we overcome this distance, we have discovered something else. What’s more, different realities exist at every scale.

Discovering new worlds in pursuit of the core of our own is a feat, but then what does that make our reality? What does that make the conglomerate of all phenomena? An expression. It’s all one giant expression, and there is no is, there is only does.

Instead of using the term explaining phenomena, let’s exchange that with the term modeling phenomena. Because mathematics in itself doesn’t explain anything. It is language.

Mathematics is the most fundamental variety of truth. It comes before scientific truth (discovered empirically), before social truth (the facts about how we behave to each other and what myths we choose to believe), and way ahead of political truth (as in “The great leader is always correct.”). And here’s a shocking was to think about this. The statement “1 + 2 = 3” is true whether or not there is a God, and also true whether or not there are humans to think about it.

This is important to note. Mathematics is a language. But there are some fundamental differences between it and other non-mathematical languages. The most important one is the near lack of any ambiguity. Language often has words, phrases, etc. that can have many meanings in many different languages and those meanings are contextual.

The question is: How much of a message do I need to understand the message’s contents with no ambiguity?

In normal human languages, this could be a very long message to extract an exact meaning (longer than the message itself) and by increasing the complexity through increasing the length of the message (over-describe something) it can build in even more ambiguity (it is often not even possible to check to see if you got a meaning right). This concept can be illustrated with the current wave of dank-deconstructionist-ironic memes going around.

Mathematics is also a very compact language.

Because of the lack of ambiguity and compactness, mathematics is amazing to model all kinds of phenomena.

Even better, when dealing with the physical world, a model can be made where the error of collecting the data to create the model is observed and passed along to the model. This is very important in any science. A scientific fact is one where the observation (data) is assumed to have an error instead of just assuming something is right or wrong (which is what humans naturally do; seeing is believing). In other words: The burden of truth lies on the data collected and can be statistically measured. However, if someone tells someone else a statement, the burden of truth often lies with a person choosing to believe indirect observations “at face value”.

I humbly think that if the world had a better grasp on this, we could avoid many conflicts. Beliefs are fluid, they aren’t absolute in truthfulness. They can fall on a degree of truth, but humans often don’t see it that way. Belief is often not open to rational criticism nor is it updated to incorporate new observations. But scientific facts and mathematical models are known to improve as new observations are made, and that is the whole point. Finding a better model.

We will eventually find a reasonably accurate yet eternally incomplete model of what we call “UFO’s”. We will someday have the clarity of unambiguity in UFOlogy. It will take time. Frankly, I do not believe humans have even remotely come close to understanding what they seek. Let alone know how to ask the right questions to create a valid line of inquiry. We are just the dominant primate life on this planet. We dream of adequateness and worthiness of the delusions we tell ourselves. The Universe has no obligation to make sense to you.

Whether they come from inner space or outer space may not ultimately matter. The source of this phenomena will undoubtedly be more bizarre and unsettling than we can currently imagine. As the fleeting spark of humanity slowly evolves, the search and quest for truth may be our ultimate reward.

PEACE

Like this article?
Leave a tip!





(We use PayPal but you don’t need an account with PayPal.)

 

Reigns of Alien Communication

I commonly encounter a prevalent viewpoint in UFOlogy that disturbs me a little. This viewpoint is based wholly on our limitations and anthropomorphic expectations. A lot of people have a very narrow view of how truly alien communication must be. It is not going to be in any language we know or have known in the past. It will be a very high strange event. It will not be understood or even possibly recognized as communication at the start. It is going to be something completely unexpected. Our brains would not be equipped natively for the task. Good thing for our brain’s ability of neural plasticity.

For an understanding of our language and this applies to theirs too they would need to understand many diverse aspects of our cultures. To be able to infer correctly they would have to understand us on a level that they could not ever attain. They are not from Earth. They would not share the same collective history as we all do as being Earthicans. Even sharing all this commonality we on Earth have extreme difficulty understanding each other’s languages. How many languages do you speak? The only reason that we ever had a chance of understanding ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics is that the Rosetta Stone was discovered. Otherwise, we would never know what they said with any certainty. Language is a highly specialized thing for like creatures. True alien intelligence is not going to be anything like ours. How could it ever possibly be? It could and should not be inferred that they understand us intrinsically. When these hypothetical aliens try to communicate it is not going to be understood first off.

Our modern scientific understanding of the Universe is woefully incomplete. It is forever an incomplete vision. We are the limiting factor in this understanding of the real. Whatever that ultimately means?

Let’s be laser-like in our perception. There are regions of the Universe that are billions of years older than our local group of stars and galaxies. Even with our current low state of knowledge and technology, we know that planet formation appears to be the rule as opposed to the exception in the Cosmos. It appears to be an observable fact in our collective knowledge. We see planets all over where we look when we look with the right technological eyes.

It truly is no real leap in logic or expectation that very old, very advanced alien life exists. Possibly many such Galactic winners exist out there in the vast unknown. It only takes one of these winners to survive the insurmountable odds and survive till the pinnacle of their evolution. So advanced, so real in absolute probability. A headstart of a few billion years would be enough time for them to advance to what we would perceive as Gods. That is a very incorrect assumption. God by our very narrow view of one, but not in the real sense of the word.

These aliens were not given this ability they attained it through immense unfathomable effort. They earned it, it was not granted by an infinite regress of cosmic tortoises.

If a species of life somewhere in the Cosmos has evolved to its ultimate conclusion, I know what we can expect. Expect the completely unexpected in every sense of the word. An intelligence that is the absolute, at least from our low neural density perspective. The pinnacle of intellect with commensurate form and function. These sufficiently advanced intelligence’s will be the ultimate in the expression of “knowledge makes reality”. By either some mechanical assist (of some kind) or by force of will and consciousness they would appear as gods to us single planet humans. Such sublime intelligence from our reference frame will and would transcend space and time. They were perhaps like us but has now become more. Some religions are belief systems call creatures like them “Transcended”. They were perhaps like us but has now become more. It correctly should be referred to as “Attained”. The other word has spirituality overtones which are incorrect in basic assumptions.

This advanced species of life has overcome all dimensional considerations of space and time. They would know the beginning and the end of everything. Their consciousness collective or otherwise would span the Universe in zero time. Our paltry 4-dimensions would not be a problem since they would understand the Universe at all points in time. Their expression of thought would envelop each and every living thing within their focus and attention. From our limited perception, it would seem like a mirror image iteration of Carl Jung’s “Collective Unconscious” idea. He was incorrect in scope and function, “Universal Consciousness” is more apt of a name when you consider how an active alien intelligence could influence and direct this new form of consciousness.

A new emergent form of synesthesia is what would be required.

This Universal mind would have no needs or wants. It is everything yet nothing. Neurons but not. It would be ethereal and is the fabric of the Universe at the same time.

Science can examine the phenomena of the Universe but there is always a distance. You can never know a phenomenon you can only know how it expresses itself. That distance that abstraction is the fire in which they burn. The mind of the Universe will never be measured by any instrumentation or machine of even our distant technological advancements. No machine (or construction) will ever do it. Only sufficiently advanced consciousnesses could ever do that. Through consciousness is the only way, the only method of communication and recognition. This cosmic fabric of the Intelligensia or Illuminati will appear as near omnipotence but not in direct influence. Since they are pure thought (for a certain point of view) at least in their communication we and all intelligence in the Universe should and will be able to perceive this prime mover. A sufficient amount of complex neurology is required to perceive them accurately.

The human race would be just developing the sufficient brain power to emerge into the dark and light unknown. Few humans at the start would have this perception and ability to perceive this ubiquitous intelligence. This understanding is an attainment, not a gift. It would take immense effort and pain to attain true communication. The pain would be caused by having to interpret this high-powered intelligence. We do not understand the truly unknown. Lessons must be learned by your brain, these may seem traumatic in the process. The ultimate “thinking outside the box”. They would use what you know and modify it to teach you their aspects of communication. This would be scary and disturbing due to the steep and alien learning curve. They would show you lesson after lesson of focus until you understand their cognitive processes.

These lessons could be likened to the 14th-century epic poem “Dante’s Inferno“. Dante passes through the gate of Hell, which bears an inscription ending with the famous phrase “Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch’intrate“, translated as “Abandon all hope, ye who enter here. All hope is not lost just buried deep in translation.

Since this whole process of communication is an attainment and not a gift, the steps of understanding take effort and personal dedication. As this would be a process that takes energy not magic, many people will fail to recognize the intelligence let alone pass the focusing tuning trials. These trials are referred to as trials due to the effort involved. This effort comes at a cost This cost comes in the form of effort and the discomfort of new discovery.

This ancient intelligence that permeates throughout our existence at once is the epitome of peace. They want or need nothing from our planet or us other than to establish a meaningful relationship. They only want to experience our level of reality in which we burn. Since our concept of dimensionality is based on their ever-present influence. This influence is correctly interpreted as through our most human of words … love. Love is just a word, our word but it is the only one that fits the situation best through our crude linguistics.

They have no motives at all, they just are. They care about us because we are them. We are an expression of the Universe trying to understand itself. They span the Universe in thought. We can think for example of being on Mars, Pluto, or across the galaxy. All we would need is accurate information to have an accurate imagination (conscious thought). This intelligence knows every particle position of every elemental particle in the Universe at any given time. Give them a few billion years to hone their mental mojo along with their technology and all can be known at any given time. It would be similar to our primitive idea of “remote viewing” just light years ahead of our primitive understanding.

This intelligence is not a deity. Just a different expression of life, just one from our perception which is high strange in nature.

The intelligence did not create the Universe any more than we did. We are all one. Since the only communication that can span the Universe(s) is thought, they can not manipulate matter directly. They need hands and feet for that kind of material influence. This is where we come in. Our planet is super rare in the Universe. Earth has millions of species of life trundling across our dirty surfaces. We are a cosmic Eden. This makes us of high interest and consideration to the Universal intelligence. Life, all life is precious. All life matters. All life has their own particular perception. each life forms consciousness is similar to what is thought of as a dimension. These dimensions are all valuable. Every living creatures dimension matters. Something can be learned from it and explored for the benefit of all. This is the same drive to save and value all life.

It is important to understand a very important distinction between this intelligence. It is not all powerful. It can not influence matter in our 4 dimensions. It is pure thought, pure energy. It is similar to the idea of radio waves moving a hammer. It can not due to the fact that it is electromagnetic is energy not matter.

This intelligence would not be like the fictitious “Q” from Star Trek. No snapping fingers here. The intelligence needs minds to influence matter. That infers that we and the other attained civilizations are its eyes and ears in our planetary collective (group). They are energy at least in their communication. Our immature idea of what a god is wrong. No magic, no matter manipulation. All influence is mental from the intelligence. This is the only way it actually could be when you really think about it and realize that any other line of thought is just anthropomorphic nonsense. Not our fault this easily made mistake. We are bombarded with fantasy, science fiction, and religion. All have an effect of spreading disinformation in their own way.

The concept of “Oneness” is a good one to explore. This intelligence is singular in expression and intention. That is to unite all living creatures in the Universe under harmony and peace. Imagine what that would mean. It means that Earth has friends all over the Universe. Friends that realize that all expressions of life anywhere are precious and in need of actualization. Friends may already be here. The few beacons of light that have attained are what was referred to as Angels and Demons. Whatever that might mean? Reflections, paradox bounces. Beauty or ugliness is in the mind of the beholder.

This is not something that should be feared. The awareness focusing would be difficult. It has to be. Since their influence is in the thought realm and not directly in our 4D reality, many will fail to be able to recognize this influence. This is not a personal failing on their part just that their neurology cannot comprehend it. No more their fault that a person being born blind to the visible spectrum is in regards to sight.

The number of emergent people would be very low in comparison to the population as a whole. Our human brains are just becoming able to comprehend this highly pervasive intelligence. Many people would have an inkling but no real understanding. Understanding is a spectrum as everything else is. The spectrum would span the gamut from fully actualized to no awareness at all. This might account for what we see when we examine world history.

These people that attained a level of awareness have existed and would exist now. I suspect our neurology has only been sufficiently complex enough for awareness and comprehension since we evolved into modern hominids. Maybe longer but I would doubt it.

This situation is the ultimate “win-win-win” scenario. You, I, and Everyone win. Imagine the world where everyone is friends. Everyone has a vested interest in everyone else. No nation states that divide us into “us and them”. Imagine a planet lead by our best and brightest minds who care for all.

Peace.

Like this article?
Leave a tip!





(We use PayPal but you don’t need an account with PayPal.)