Tag Archives: UFO questions

High Entropy N.H.I. Data Transfer Hypothesis

We, humans, co-create our reality every second of every day. This alien pervasive intelligence manifests in each of us possibly very differently. Because we are all different minds. You question a 100 experiencers you could possibly get 100 different alien encounter types. All valid expressions of the event experienced. It is a reflection, compaction, and creation of the observer’s perceptions not a reflection of the Universe. Important to note that this intelligence is NOT a deity. It is NOT omnipotent. It is just so sufficiently different than us that it has retreated from our perceptual ability to view in clarity. You can never know the true nature of a phenomenon. You can only know how it expresses itself. There is a very real intelligent phenomenon behind this but it is not a simple one.

What is at the heart of information. How is it generated, transferred, and received? The word “Information” is as all other words are just placeholders for true meaning and influence. Entropy is a measure of uncertainty. High entropy means the data has high variance and thus contains a lot of information and/or noise. Note that noise and information go hand in hand. Noise is the useless information contained in the data but they both add to the entropy.

For instance, a constant function where f(x) = 4 for all x has no entropy and is easily predictable, has little information, has no noise and can be succinctly represented. Similarly, f(x) = ~4 has some entropy while f(x) = random number is very high entropy due to noise. Entropy means uncertainty. High entropy means it hard to predicate the next possibility. eg: All n possible moves have 1/n probability. Low entropy means a particular next move is obviously observed. eg: Next Move 1 has 0.01% probability and next move 2 has 99.99% probability.

If entropy is high (encoding size is big on average), it means we have many message types with small probabilities. Hence, every time a new message arrives, you’d expect a different type than previous messages. You may see it as a disorder or uncertainty or unpredictability. When a message types with much smaller probability than other message types happens, it appears as a surprise because on average you’d expect other more frequently sent message types.

Low entropy means that most of the times we are receiving the more predictable information which means less disorder, less uncertainty, less surprise, more predictability and less (specific) information.

Also, a rare message type has more information than more frequent message types because it eliminates a lot of other probabilities and tells us more specific information.

Its this extra specificity and more specific information that I am considering when I think of Non-Human Intelligence communication (NHI).

Many people around the world are having a highly strange N.H.I. contact experience right now as you read this line of text. A “First Contact” with an alien intelligence event of the most personal kind. These people are having a highly specialized experience. One that works for them and them alone. One that is co-created by their consciousness every Plank second of every day. It is not optional or voluntary but required in the most basic evolutionary way. It manifests in their consciousness as disrupted high strange, synchronistic, and appears to have an information transfer component. The experience is as unique as each of us is. Diamonds in the rough spans the spectrum to highly polished beings. Unique minds having unique experiences. These experiences transcend time and space. It boils common sense into a paste of naivete. Truly thinking outside of our colloquial box is painful and frightening. The pain of logic failures and fears of the cheese dropping off your cracker can be a formidable foe. Eyes open no FEAR.

As an experiencer myself I believe I have a unique perspective on how at least one of the non-human intelligence’s in the Universe attempts to pass information to our primitive primate minds. It is my hope to ring true to some degree to be relevant even if the content of contact is different. There is continuity we just have to find it.

This intelligence is just another life form that has evolved to its pinnacle of evolution somewhere else in the Universe. It has evolved past our ability to perceive with our very imperfect linear, full of primitive bias, full of fear of the unknown minds. Some people can perceive these realms of thought that are ignored or unperceivable by the masses on this planet. It is an emergent ability for our species to be able to perceive their influence directly.

This intelligence may appear like a god or deity to us lowly single planet humans. They are NOT omnipotent. They are NOT gods at all just another expression of life like us but unbelievably ancient. This intelligence is old, very, very old. Older than our star, older than our planet by levels of magnitude. They will appear on the first contact as deities to some. I completely understand why people would think that. Something that roughly fits the bill of our fables and nightmares. They communicate through a form of telepathy. It is not words, emotions, or anything else that words could possibly describe. It is an alien mind overlapping with yours. They do not intrinsically understand us any more than we understand them. For minds to meet that have no evolution in common at all is going to be a highly disturbing sanity questioning kind of encounter. As each person is different each contact modality could be highly unique to the individual. All different but all saying a form of “Heads Up” or “Hello”. Your response to it dictates how it proceeds with you or not. The gambit of emotions run from pure animal cornered terror to exaltation and curiosity. Fear is the mind-killer in this situation. I can not stress this enough.

This intelligence is vast in its breadth and influence. They are not meat and bones but something ultimately more evolved. They are NOT us from another planet or moon. They are NOT all-knowing. Their origins are more complex than we can comprehend at this time. A true alien life form.

You must have the perspective that this sort of thing could happen in the first place.

If you are like I was prior to May 3, 2017, you might not believe that anything like this is possible. All based on the incorrect assumption that if it was truly happening, it would be happening to you or at least you would know about it. On both points…nope. I have no real confirmed idea on what contact criteria they use but there is obviously some criteria followed. Most people do not discuss truly disturbing events openly. Not a conspiracy of silence. Just a result on how first contact manifests. If you have had the experience I suspect you intimately understand why it has to be done this way one person at a time as opposed to landing en masse during the Superbowl or some other high attendee crowd. It just does not work like that. Evidence, as our monkey brains expect, is just not possible at this stage of contact. The evidence is the experience itself.

Now I know what you science-minded people are thinking. This makes no scientific sense, and you are right. It does not and will defy our low mentality senses. If you are a thinking creature you must realize that humanity has only had science for under 400 years. That is a less than hummingbirds blink of an eye in the deep time of the Universe. We do not even know what makes up 80% of the Universes mass. We, humans, have the very basics of materialistic reality figured out to the best of intellectual capacity at this time. Our understanding of elementary particles and sub-particles will seem laughable to our future selves of just a few centuries hence. Knowledge is not absolute it changes due to intellectual capacity. If any scientist thinks they have it all figured out, believe they know what is possible in this vast almost entirely unknown universe is a fool a dangerous fool. We, humans, are new brains on the block who have dreams of superiority and totality. We do not deserve either of those descriptors.

Science in its current low iteration is the anti-wisdom of “A wise man knows he knows nothing“. They think they know everything and have a one size toolbox to fix any problem and suss out the truth in any situation. Science is wholly the wrong toolbox of skills and tools to wield at this phenomena. Science was designed overtime to deal with questions of our environment and our collective place in it. Science says nothing and never can about our personal place in the cosmos. The question of “I think therefore I am” will eternally be beyond the scientific method as are all of the really transformative aspects of the Real are. Beyond any instrumentation or construction. Science is awesome beyond belief but is not at all what will solve this phenomenon.

In the Experiencer culture contact and information exchange on average is a one-way street. It manifests in different personal expressions of knowing. A type of knowing that transcends time/space and causality. An absolute knowing without gaining the knowledge externally. Not magic but a bizarre form of telepathy from a mind that has no simile to terrestrial animals and YOU.

A common message that Experiencers seem to receive is archetypal in nature. That is a common motif of contact. That is their version of how we communicate with ants. Imagine that a lone worker ant walks past your picnic table on the ground. It can not perceive what a table leg is. It can’t perceive what a table is at all as it passes by. All that it knows is that there is usually some crumbs over there in that corner. Our crumbs that fall from sandwiches and hoagies appear as just normal reality and through repeated cycles, it becomes expected reality.

Our presence to the ant appears as just reality as it sees it. Us and all things of macroscopic influence are beyond the ant’s mentality. We would appear to the ant as just background reality. We know nothing about the ant language but we understand basically the chemical mechanism which they use to communicate with the hive. We can collect their pheromones and can make them move around as if they are following orders by laying trails as they do. The ants seem to follow the trails but what are we actually telling them without any context of consciousness. We have no idea how the ant perceives this artificial pheromone communication distribution.

How does the ant perceive this attempt at communication without proper context? How could we form a pheromone that could make the ant think a thought it has never before? How can we make a pheromone that would make the ant understand as we do as to what a table is? You can’t that is the limitation of the ant’s intelligence and consciousness. There is no way to make the ant perform the intellectual and evolutionary jump to be able to understand as an approximation of how we do.

When the NHI attempts communication they try to replicate our essence of communication they feed us our version of a pheromonal trail. We perceive this replayed reality as archetypal in nature. It seems to be the result of possible data compression, concision, and desire to communicate. It does infer strongly a non-intrinsic understanding of us or our languages.

Something that is self-evident to some is that we co-create our reality as we go along. We float in an eternal mix of raw energies of all flavors. We have evolved to be highly efficient in our environment. Through our perceptual limitations, we see only a small sliver of reality. A human mind is an exceptional machine that has been designed to disregard the bulk of the EM spectrum and reality. It is that filtration, compression, that separates us eternally from perceiving the totality of what is real.

It is a separation that is impregnable. We create our reality by filtration and choice. We miss by evolutionary need the bulk of what is happening around us. We co-create along with the universal energies influence your own consciousness. One cannot be separated from the other. No mind is an island in this interconnectedness.

How could an alien mind like this convey high entropy information to a person such as instructions on how to build a new type of energy source for example. How could this intelligence make you understand something that you have never thought of not even in the remotest possibilities ever? It can’t, it just does not work like that.

They have the persons mind and cognitive capacity to consider what could be transferred and hopefully interpreted correctly. They can not just implant genius-level tech into a mind that has no capabilities for understanding. They have to work with what you know and over time assist in attempting you get to new avenues of thought. They can show you things and concepts but ultimately you have to walk through the door of understanding yourself.

The best person to communicate new scientific concepts too in physics, for example, is to have a skilled physicist as an experiencer. For revelations in form and function in the Arts would be to have an artist as an experiencer. There is no magical implantation of specific high entropy information into a mind that cannot possibly comprehend it. Who knows how a personal contact modality may interpret the attempt of knowledge beyond the humans capacity of thought. Could get weird.

It can show you things but it is up to you to extend your knowledge to try to understand what it is showing you. Intrinsically a slow process. Understanding is an attainment, not a gift. Understanding is a spectrum of ideas and thoughts.

As stated several times before every person on this planet has possibly unique contact modality. One in which works for the subject’s mind to achieve communion and contact. The method that you communicate may be different than outlined above and that is perfectly OK. Each person’s chronicle of contact is of value to the whole. It is only you that can figure out how your own personal modality works. It is through correlation that meaning may eventually flow in a very meaningful way to benefit all of humanity.

Benevolent ET – Malevolent ET… Is it just our perception?

If there are some less beneficial ETI (as has also been reported by contactees and/or experiencers) it stands to reason that there may be an agreement among different ETI civilizations that are able to operate on Earth; a balance of power, so to speak.

According to specific communications received and confirmed by several ‘antennas’ inside the Rahma contacts (including R. Gonzalez) since the 1970’s, unfortunately, some ETs would conquer or destroy us and there is in place a protection mechanism under the intention of allowing humans opportunities to continue evolving.

But if one is in the military it is understandable not to want to rely solely upon the protection of others but, rather, to participate in one’s own protection. If segments of the human family have developed gravity (and inertial) shielding and a stage previous to transdimensional technologies, including energy-transmitting, scalar, longitudinal pulses (that may have affected the flight of some ETI craft causing them to crash), it is conceivable that the technology can be enhanced and perfected.

Dr. Greer stated that ETI prefer not to materialize their craft completely in our physical system because – by doing so- they become vulnerable. There may, in fact, be some ETI craft not impervious to what we can do and 72+ years of continuous secret research into their technologies has probably yielded viable results as per what technologies humans can fabricate to counteract at least some ETI craft. Unfortunately, this path of self-defense is being overdone. It may well be that the public is being honed to fear the ETI by declarations like Mr. Delonge’s.

The path of weaponizing against ETI craft should be second to the emphasis of establishing peaceful contacts with their makers and inspiring humanity to desire a more connected and wiser way of living in harmony with each other and with nature. Moreover, the emphasis on weaponizing would likely attract countermeasures and more negativity from the few ETI entities we are probably being protected from.

Even if Mr. DeLonge had been briefed about some genuine negative events with UFOs, he is overdoing that aspect. I understand that even if the majority of events appear to be benevolent and some are not, there is a genuine need to prepare to defend ourselves. However, we need to be able to handle this proportionately – without fear-mongering – because we need to collectively prepare to grow up as a species, understand more advanced or fundamental connecting principles, and to establish peaceful contact with the experiencer reported majority of benevolent extraterrestrial intelligences (some or all of whom may be interdimensional, from the future, another frequency domain, parallel universe, etc).

With the significant ex-Government employee influences they exert on the media, TDL and TTSA should also mention the importance of attempting peaceful contacts with the ETs that do not seem to be a threat (and which have been manifesting on Earth quite likely for eons of linear time). Since they have already spoken and written about the importance of psi phenomena and consciousness, they should attempt telepathy and other such means to establish (along with selected researchers and contactees) a constructive rapport with some of the UAP intelligences. At the very least to find out who is who among them and who may already be our long-time allies.

What I find rather perplexing is the generalization of ETI as one basic group, even with the different races. There is no inclination, it seems, to look at the various levels of their evolution. Even something as simple are referencing the Kardashev scale and placing them somewhere in it.

I would seem that a Type I would have a vastly different relationship with humans than a Type III, for example. It would still seem, though, that any race that has developed the ability to travel through the stars would be respectful of other planets and races still in their lower evolutionary states. The notion, imho, would be to assist them somehow in any way they would be paying attention.

Any race observing the current condition of our planetary chaos and lack of attention to each other as well as our sustainability would probably keep their distance. Attempts to ‘conquer’ with advanced technology would be indefensible, it would seem, and yet none has ever occurred… ever. Yet, we still want to conquer each other.

I believe that if we focus too much on the “threat” ETs may pose we may attract it. However, threat assessments cannot be ignored either under a neutral exopolitical assessment, a love and light assessment or a national (and worldwide) security assessment. However, I think that we should focus more on getting to know our “visitors” through peaceful means; a mutual respect based on the spiritual and consciousness factors we share with them. Interestingly, in the article “Would Contact with Extraterrestrials Benefit or Harm Humanity?

A Scenario Analysis” by Baum, Haqq-Misra, and Domagal-Goldman, it is speculated that even ET culture varieties guided by universalist, pro-diversity and ecological values might find us to be a peril to the cosmos and wipe us out to preserve more forms of life. From the perspective of not knowing who the “visitors” are it is a rational consideration. In fact, many other of their considerations are reasonable. Another consideration is that just because most have been friendly towards us we would have to trust that they will not have a change of heart or dissident opinions that are against us.

Since they are not perfect, a peaceful, advanced civilization may inadvertently contaminate us with a virus or a mistake on their part their presence may increase human disarray and discouragement about our alleged superiority in the scheme of things. But if we knew for sure that they have been active on land, and the skies, and under the oceans for eons on Earth, even taking humans in various ways without being catastrophic to life (as far as we know), we would have to learn to live with them.

For instance, we would need to know how to distinguish the signatures of ET craft from ever more advanced (perhaps anti-gravity) human craft and allow the former to go about their business. Is the ape side of our nature capable of adapting by being embraced by our universalist side?

We already ARE living with them, Giorgio. That’s the distinction many are still not willing to admit, let alone understand. From a number of accounts from off-planet trips given to certain ones, the information is consistent in that other civilizations, like ours, have destroyed themselves. NO civilization has been destroyed or manipulated directly by ETI. In fact, the overwhelmingly consistent message is that we need help, not hindrance, in our evolutionary path to sustainability. We’re threatening that on our own currently.

Whether by atomic blast (some civilization have succumbed) or by natural disasters due negligence of natural order, we’re still on the brink of both potentially. We’ve not listened to early warnings about not understanding the atom and we’ve certainly caused extinctions of species beyond comparison in the last century, if not half-century due to our behavior toward our environment.

How can we possibly be so ignorant of our own activity?

We are threatening ourselves perhaps more than how ETI may be doing so but why? Perhaps the current expression of our human nature and potential make it impossible not to be like this. Perhaps our human nature has not awakened to its universalist potential beyond physical life because the need to attend to physical needs in a classic way is too great. And, perhaps, no amount of facts and good reasons can do much to change this. What we need to change may be incredibly profound.

Worldwide, individuals (as members of the human species) tend to be stubbornly parochial or simplistic and two-valued in their worldviews. By two-valued, I mean dichotomous. And most are willing to defend those views by setting aside facts and reason. Or simply to reassert a personal sense of identity against someone else who stated something different. It is a thickheadedness. Perhaps a stubbornness stemming from our evolutionary path.

In fact, fight or flight regions in our brains automatically lit up when we see a member of another race approaching. Our first response is “potential threat.” And emotional attachments prevail over facts and reason unless it is the way of our identity tribe to think otherwise. We are tribal. We all seek to fulfill the same basic needs but divide ourselves into affinity or similarity groups. It is identity politics. The “us vs. them” inclination is atavistic, maybe ever since we roamed in primate troupes, hunting parties and defended our paleolithic in-group and wives.

Besides personal and character differences, many of us abide by the majority rule and can be rather easily swayed by group pressure to be cooperative, kind and respectful of differences or idiotic a-holes. Denial of reality is a continuous characteristic everywhere unless our identity group reassures us that it’s cool to prefer facts. But even if we were to prefer facts, we tend to fall into personal privileges. And abuse of power and corruption is rampant and makes life miserable and indignified all over the world.

Legal and illegal mafias all over while we tend to seek immediate gratification. As inveterate cavemen, we tend not to plan far into the future. Moreover, in spite of widespread historical information and technologies that have changed how we live, technologies that have reduced poverty levels, mortality levels, and increased literacy, we tend to repeat our ancestors’ political mistakes because after two or three generations historical memory is typically lost. Books and documentaries do not replace actual living circumstances.

Thus (as Francis Fukuyama noted), many young students in recent demographic cohorts feel that the leadership for the European Union in Brussels is tantamount to fascism! In spite of their poor attention spans, and about one hundred twenty bits per second of processing capacity people are inundated with data and are too lazy and unable to sort genuine information from fake.

This is why we elect narcissistic bullies that engage brain pleasure centers of hope. And the post-WWII, healthy liberal, shared dream of creating a more inclusive, civic, pluralistic, fair world; to spread (and improve) Democracy falters not only under the sway of large corporations controlling public needs and politics but also under nativist, autocratic bravado with easy promises (and a socially-sanctioned scandalous denial of facts) catering to frustrated and fearful voting population segments tired of losing center stage. And a long ETC…

Perhaps we need engaging narratives that tell a new story. Or, perhaps, we can become a wiser species by conscious efforts that awaken us to our deeper nature or do we need artificial enhancement? Maybe we need to be forced to react by disasters? https://www.fastcompany.com/…/why-its-so-hard-to-pay…

“What Planet Are You From?”

…is the title a cute comedy film about a lovesick alien that has a change of heart about wanting to take over the Earth. It is also the question that many “Earthlings” might ask if they were to meet a live ET. 
According to the highly speculative popular UFO literature, many assertions have been made claiming the source of origin of UFOs to be from one star system or another. Top answers to the question include Zeta Reticulae, Arcturus and the Pleiades.

TRIBAL WARFARE ON PLANET EARTH

In the 20th century alone, over 100 million humans were killed in wars and revolutions. Ufologist Stanton Friedman has observed that “tribal warfare” is a major human endeavor. Therefore, it’s extremely unlikely that any information we receive from the so-called ETs about their planet of origin will be accurate. I imagine that self-preservation is a strategy with universal appeal. If the beings associated with UFOs ever told us where they come from, it seems likely that in a few hundred years we might want to export what Stanton called “our brand of ‘friendship’ to the stars.”

SNR, Signal to Noise Ratio

I remember the term that prominent UFO researcher Grant Cameron has applied to the messages that experiencers receive from alleged ET sources. The signal-to-noise ratio is often abbreviated according to Wikipedia as SNR or S/N). In scientific applications it compares the amount of useful signal to background noise. SNR can also be used to compare the ratio of desired information to irrelevant data in say an online discussion. The “noise” here might be off topic comments that prevent relevant data from being exchanged.

When UFO researchers are given supposedly accurate information from unacknowledged sources of so-called insiders, opportunities to verify the data are often non-existent. Thus by dutifully repeating such unverifiable accounts, a journalist or UFO researcher runs the risk of disseminating disinformation meant to confuse or deceive the public.

When it comes to encounters with representatives of what might be called “higher intelligence agencies,” the so-called aliens can be reasonably expected to be doing something very similar. What experiencers are told is probably a mixture of some true information along with disinformation. In addition, it is likely that human experiencers might not have the capacity to accurately transmit knowledge that is beyond their level of comprehension. Experiencers’ narratives might therefore reflect human limitations and not always a deliberate attempt to systematically deceive.

THOSE ATTEMPTING PEACEFUL INTERACTIONS ARE ON THE FRINGE

As a part time promoter of a diverse network of contactees that I call the “Contact Underground,” I count myself among the flying saucer faithful. It is my assessment that the UFO phenomenon is likely, at least in part, extraterrestrial in nature. Attempts to peacefully interact with UFO intelligence in my judgment is a socially responsible course of action.

This endeavor understandably is considered to be fringe by the larger society. Alas contactees have also been disparaged by important elements of the UFO research community. In my opinion the UFO research “mainstream” has placed too much attention in the past on collecting sighting reports. Although perhaps not impossible, it would be a radical step for most UFO investigators to develop protocols that would enable them to directly interact with the alleged ETs as we in the contact network claim that we are doing.

“SPEAK TO ET”

It is now over 70 years since the Roswell Incident and I am compelled to ask how much more can we learn by categorizing the shape, color, position in the sky and other physical parameters of UFOs? Like it or not, if we are going to advance our knowledge of the phenomenon then we may have to do as researcher Grant Cameron has suggested in his many public lectures and that is, “Speak to ET.”

This is what I imagine the contact activists are attempting to do. Although the signal to noise ratio may not always be the best, directly interacting with UFO intelligence and staging Human Initiated Contact Experiences (HICE) is a path that increasing numbers of UFO experiencers are pursuing.

It’s No Wonder We’re a Bit Confused by Intelligence

Intelligence is Over-rated

I’ve been involved with this field for several decades openly and a couple more as an early experiencer of high strangeness. It certainly doesn’t make me an authority, yet I do have some perspectives that few seem to garner as experiencers. I have an above average intelligence, last clocked online at around 151 using my opposite hand just to make it interesting and no rum was involved. My adoptive parents told me early tests were higher and they feared that telling me would turn me into an intellectual snob. Perhaps I have in the minds of some.

Lately there has been yet another flurry of details regarding Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), Unidentified Submerged Objects (USOs) and top secret government intelligence programs that have been studying them. Luis Elizondo recently spilled the beans on an obscure government program he was involved in that was tasked with studying the UFO phenomena, AATIP was its acronym. The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program was supposedly led by him. He ‘quit’ the Pentagon because it he was frustrated by the cover-up.

Wow, what a news story that nearly every media outlet picked up on and made Luis an icon in Ufology almost instantly. Was he really involved or, like many, chose to sprinkle some truth in a large lie to get attention? Yes, AATIP existed, and it “did pursue research and investigation into unidentified aerial phenomena,” Pentagon spokesperson Christopher Sherwood was quoted as saying by Keith Kloor, journalist for The Intercept. However, he added: “Mr. Elizondo had no responsibilities with regard to the AATIP program while he worked in OUSDI [the Office of Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence], up until the time he resigned effective 10/4/2017.”

Intelligence or Insanity?

Luis isn’t the first to muddy the waters in Ufology, though. There is a long history of folks who, with no evidence available other than their word, have forged careers out of elaborate story-telling with details that entice the ears and stimulate the minds of the listeners and readers. Jeffrey Mishlove invited me to discuss the topic in an August 2018 interview he titled ‘The Sociology of Ufology.’ We discussed the tragedy within the field and the travails of those who genuinely seek the truth of whatever is known about our visitors from space.

It seems most of the folks who do have a clue are quiet, reserved and unrecognized by those who find the UFO circuit to provide a means of accolades and notoriety. It’s a small pond in comparison to the larger picture, yet the majority of experiencers are faced with few other opportunities to gather and commune with others of like experiences. The phrase made popular by The X Files, ‘I want to believe,’ now included the necessary discernment skills to weed through the BS. How close are we to really knowing the truth?

In the larger sense, what is the truth about these visitors? We now have irrefutable evidence they exist, specifically military videos as well as officials who’ve had first hand experience, rather sightings, of craft that is obviously not of this world. This evidence has been around for decades in the Ufology circles, yet hadn’t reached the public ears and eyes through major media until this year. Still, there has been evidence that has gone relatively unnoticed from years past. It has been right in front of us, available to find, for decades.

Intelligence of the Visitors

But what of those inside the craft? Who are they and what are they doing? Why are they here and what are their intentions? How do we find out about their intelligence? Do we think the government or major media outlets are going to tells us? Heck, they don’t even know from what many gather. So what is missing? Is there an underground movement, like Dr. Joseph Burkes suggests, that is painstakingly sharing information amongst each other to corroborate and distill general discoveries and potential objectives of these visitors?

It seems that methods of communication vary, mostly telepathic and yet include non-linear and non-local metaphysical-types of temporal distortion or even time-dilation. Events that are perceived as being very physical, when viewed through quantum lenses, are evidence of a multi-dimensional reality much like Neppe and Close describe with their TDVP model of consciousness, time and space being tethered. We have one timeline, yet the experience covers multiple dimensions simultaneously.

Do we need advanced degrees in quantum mechanics to understand it all? Some my think so and certainly there is a lot of math involved in explaining things from a scientific perspective, just like Einstein tried to with his theory of relativity. Jung had many dinners with him over nearly a decade and was greatly influenced by Einstein in the development of his papers on psychiatry. Bertrand Russell was also influenced and noted that to think Einstein’s Theory of Relativity has no philosophical impact was folly. Hans Reichenbach felt that human ‘sensations’ were more, that they were intricately connected to something going on in the universe.

Intelligence within Consciousness

Back to the consciousness that is being expanded by the ‘sensations’ of engagement by non-human intelligence. It spans more than just our visitors engagement of terrestrials. These same sensations are akin to the experience of higher realms of consciousness, often accompanied by a sense of vibration that has been described as both excruciating and/or exhilarating, depending on the frame of mind of the experiencer. So there is a choice involved as to ‘how’ to experience this ‘contact’ as the case may be. If it’s startling with a sense of fear involved, it’s excruciating. On the other hand, if it’s startling with a sense of intrigue or fearlessness, it’s often exhilarating.

Is there a path of logic that fits the scenario of their intent or purpose for engaging humanity in any way? If we looked at things from the perspective of an advanced civilization, what might that be? We tend to see things only through human-centric and fearful eyes, a looming threat. If that were the case, we’d be living in a much different world. Ancient civilizations have learned much, but what? If we are fascinated with the inner-workings of matter and ‘spirit,’ could we posit that this is a general path of evolution and development of intelligence? Where would it take us?

The universe has inherent logic, math and science we have only just begun to understand even in process of entropy to negentropy, from chaos to order. Could it be possible that the communication being delivered through human contacts, interpreted in a variety of ways, is steering us toward recognizing the intricate connections we, in our expanded consciousness, have with everything around us? Consider we’re 99% space, even though we seem physical. What permeates the space we all share? How would we best engage it? Is there a path toward understanding it? What might that be?

Like this article?
Leave a tip!





(We use PayPal but you don’t need an account with PayPal.)

 

The Sociology of UFOlogy – an inquiry with Dr. Jeffrey Mishlove

Sociology of UFOlogy

For decades people have been curious and investigated UFOs in myriad ways. What is the sociology of UFOlogy today? In the late 80s Tim Beckley introduced New Age and Alien Agenda gatherings around the country. The International UFO Congress began in Tucson in 1991 with Ret. Col. Wendelle Stevens, Jim Diletosso and Ken Liljegren’s team as support.

I’ll digress for a moment. My first experiences with non-human intelligence was in 1962, advancing to something different in 1965 which was apparently the ‘normal’ type of contact in the Midwest in the 50s and 60s, the orange cigar-shaped cloud. During that same period, UFOs were apparently shutting down ICBM silos around the globe with exquisite showmanship.

Curious and investigative, I continued my quest to know, not just what, how this kinda stuff happens. I love the high strangeness. What makes it tick? I had a lot of questions, numerous events and some experiences I still wonder about today. I had deep conversations with a lot of folks; experts, researchers and experiencers across the gamut.

I got to know Tim and Wendelle over the years. Jim and I became friends and later he recommended me as manager for The Prophets Conference (1997). It gave me an opportunity to have conversations that are extremely rare, up close and personal without interruption. Some of the folks who were there: Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Dr. Steven Greer, Jose Arguelles, David Icke, Linda Molten-Howe, Stanton Friedman, Zacharia Sitchen and 2 dozen more. I got to know many prominent folks in the field of UFOlogy many years ago, with friendships still today.

2010 began by assuming responsibility for a UFO discussion group in the Phoenix valley. We met in a community room of a local fire station. Our guest speakers included Claude Swanson, Travis Walton, Alejandro Rojas and more. We also had meditation experiments using music that produced some varied and amazing personal experiences, all of a contact nature. There were about 35 people in the room. Afterward, one elderly woman reported seeing massive ET machinery surrounding the group and ‘working’ on each person.

From 2010 to 2014 I was a vendor at the IUFOC, having moved to Ft. McDowell in Arizona. In 2013 we debuted UFOlogyPRSS.com at the International UFO Congress, with over 100 blogs from around the world in one place, up-to-the-moment material. It rose the bar for UFOlogy-based websites. It was our virtual model of folks getting along even if they had opposing views. We’ve also got a number of authors featured; podcasts and radio shows, too.

Meanwhile, UFOlogy in general seems to be challenged. Experiencers are on one side and the nuts and bolts scientists on the other with conspiratorialists scattered about in each camp. Dr. Mishlove and I take a frank and open look at what the Sociology of UFOlogy is today. Although challenges do exist, there seems to be a call for change. What that will be remains to be seen.

Here’s how Dr. Mishlove framed the interview, “Here he [Zen] speaks as a participant-observer sharing his reflections on the current community of interest centering on UFO phenomena. He describes his disillusionment with a nexus of individuals focusing on the notions of the Ashtar Command and the Galactic Federation. He describes various fears associated with the very idea of alien life forms. However, he suggests that we presently have no actual evidence that there is a reason to be fearful of UFO activity.”

In the ‘contact’ scenarios, experiencers have to deal with seemingly incredulous events and still continue with some kind of ‘normal’ life. Whether individual or family needs, the daily functional activity still needs doing. There is something else going on, though, as shows like this don’t happen if the conversation isn’t necessary, imho.

Our hopes were to address common concerns and explore a little of what else is happening. I was a willing participant in spite of my trepidation. Talking about the Ashtar Command and Galactic Federation, however real and true they may be, is not the kind of talk that garners credibility normally. There’s evidence they do exist dating back to 1952 with George Van Tassel.

Although we discussed the potential confusion with deities, there is still more confusion around the topic. George Van Tassel met Robert Short, who took on the ‘Ashtar Command’ label, used it for contrary purposes and wasn’t connected to the ‘source’ like George. I met Bob in the late 1980s and didn’t feel he had a good connection, if any, talking nonsense about conspiracy theories interwoven with an Ashtar Command that would somehow take action against the cabal. The latter was infectious and unfortunately obfuscates the truth still, imho.

Jeffrey made a delicate subject easy to discuss. We had a nice mind flight. Perhaps you’ll consider sharing this article and video.

More importantly share New Thinking Allowed. Thanks in advance.

My wife asked me to include this interview from January of 2013. She said it spoke to her in ways nothing else had. She’s Russian-born and trained pianist as well as a 3HO Kundalini Yoga teacher. She has a compelling argument…

Like this article?
Leave a tip!





(We use PayPal but you don’t need an account with PayPal.)