Category Archives: Non-Human Intelligence

The Underwhelming UAP Report that Deepens the Mystery

RE: UAP Report Nonsence (all 9 pages)

Shared this because it coincides with the UAP nonsense just released by our illustrious purveyors of preposterous notions… though they may actually be true.

Not hard to predict the cluelessness when history repeats itself in the fractals of contrived information and real absence of actual material.

Communications (originally established in the 1950s) were cut off when the MIC proved to be untrustworthy.

Not sure they are lying, as many believe… the MIC don’t have a clue because they’re going at [it] the wrong way. They see [them] as separate and not a part of the natural world, like us. Truly the point of perspection (inner/outer) cannot see what it has not experienced.

The sense of threat needs to go away in order to see them clearer and understand their technology… hundreds if not thousands of years ahead of our own. How could we possibly know anything without the proper tools to understand?

Space… the final frontier… Well, here’s a crash course on the rectilinear concept. We’ve got to begin to understand where we are in the scheme of things… our reality. Conceive…. consider… conceptualize.

___________________________________ ~ from The New Science (memoirs of Wilbert Smith – Project Magnet)

As a first consideration let us consider what space appears to be to us. We have no doubts about its volumetric nature although we have no senses by which we can observe this condition. We conclude that space is volumetric by the nature of things which we find in it. What would it be like if everything were removed from space? Would we even have space?

Can we conceive of a space structure completely devoid of matter or energy in any form; real empty space? What would such space be like? If we were disembodied entities located in such a space, how could we identify our position or describe where or how we were? What sort of yardstick could we use? These and many more similar questions must be faced squarely by those seeking understanding.

When one has satisfied himself by actually doing it that he can conceive of space with absolutely nothing in it, and is not too terrified of his creation, he is then in a position to take the next step, namely to find his way about in it. An arbitrary decision can be made to refer all concepts to where the investigator conceives himself to be, thereby establishing a point. [This ‘point,’ literally, is critical for the observation of awareness and reality, the I/eye of our being.]

He can next conceive of an adjacent point, thereby establishing a line. By turning in various directions he can establish the concepts of surfaces and volumes. But no matter what he does after that, the investigator cannot add more concepts to the space itself. He therefore concludes that what he instinctively felt soon after he first conceived the empty space, that it was volumetric, and nothing more, is correct.

The foregoing is actually an exercise in mental gymnastics, but as physical exercise is necessary for body-building, so are these exercises necessary for the building of understanding. It is absolutely necessary to satisfy oneself on these points before going on to the next concept.

The next step is to conceive of a way of getting about in this empty space, and to realize that one has done so when the operation is complete. The concept of an adjacent position, or point, is a good approach, and here again the operation becomes one of mental gymnastics, and a lot of manipulation and practice is necessary to get the feel of the situation.

As one gains in understanding of the properties of space, the various geometries become evident, and it becomes increasingly obvious that a wide variety can be made to work, if certain basic parameters are admitted. However, since our concern is primarily with our space and our universe, we will want to select the geometry that best fits our experience.

Ordinary Euclidean or rectilinear geometry is quite familiar and comprehensible to us, and we can understand easily how it can be applied to space as we conceive it. We can understand a sideways, forwards-backwards, up-down concept, or expressed mathematically, and x, y and z axis. Also, we experience no great difficulty in conceiving of these three axes as converging at right angles to a single point and extending outward therefrom to enormous distances. We can even introduce the idea of infinity in any direction as being somewhat beyond the farthest distance in which we have any interest.

In our rectilinear concept we can conceive of such a thing as a straight line, although we might be hard put to define it, since the concept is in itself axiomatic. However, if we understand what a straight line actually is in our concept and we are sure that others with whom we communicate also have the same understanding, we can use it as a real datum point in our appreciation of our universe. This point is of particular significance in what is to follow, as it is one of the few solid anchors we have on which to fasten our understanding. Let us never lose sight of this concept of a straight line, as entirely distinct from the behavior of matter or energy.

Our rectilinear concept at once validates our Euclidean geometry. Furthermore, it removes any limitations which might be imposed on it by either great or small distances. It provides us with a clear-cut framework within which we can think our way about in space. We should satisfy ourselves that this concept actually is a necessary and sufficient condition for this purpose, although we remember that its selection was arbitrary and that other geometries probably would work just as well.

However, since we have made our decision to use the rectilinear concept, we must be prepared to stick to our decision unless and until proved wrong. As a matter of fact, any geometry can be used, and will work within the limiting parameters of its definitions. It is only when extended beyond these limits that corrections become necessary, but even with the corrections the geometry itself does not become invalid, only the things we expect it to do.

Another older resource from an interview with George Van Tassel

What we still have yet to reveal within ourselves is the notion that what has been stated in both scientific and spiritual perspectives, albeit slightly differently, is that all things are connected. We’d be fools to ignore the evidence of experiencers and their awareness that indeed this is so. We consider categorization and nomenclature as a kind of separation into different aspects of reality and yet modern science is proving that this practice is simply folly.

For example, there are many resources that essentially cross-reference the reality of interconnectedness. Neppe and Close posit that consciousness, space and time are tethered across nine dimensions; Mironova (Russian Academenian) offers a dissertation on recent scientific discoveries on the mutations of our specie. William Swygard discovered a method to explore other-dimensional consciousness across nine planes (perhaps a direct experience of the TDVP model of Neppe and Close.

How we explore these realms will determine the revealing of their congruence and continuity with what the ancient calendars have offered regarding the period of time we are currently in, the transition between ages, from the Piscean (patriarchal) to the Aquarian (matriarchal) and another admonition Smith shares from his conversations with ‘people from elsewhere’ – that we ought to direct our questions to Mother Earth. The Gaia Hypothesis has been around for a while now, though we haven’t really considered the implication of being able to communicate directly with her. It’s a concept far too fringy for the fray…

Conversation with God – Is There a ‘Perfected’ Form, Fit and Function?

Coming of Age

I’m not anyone special, though my experience is unique and weird. It started with a voice inside, advanced to trips to an orange cigar-shaped cloud a few years later and culminated in an NDE in college that presented a profound path to follow; it was like a conversation with ‘God,’ beginning with the mention of helping to facilitate a ‘new world order’ in my lifetime. Well, that’s enough to turn folks off right away.

A few years ago I had the opportunity to discuss what that [new world order] really means from my perspective and understanding. I was invited by Dr. Jeffery Mishlove, an honor and 28-year process of completion. I was hosting a new show, One World, back in 1990 and hoped someday I’d be worthy of an interview with one of the icons I hoped to emulate, Bill Moyers or Jeffrey Mishlove.

This has been a focus of my attention for over 40 years, sometimes obsessively so, attempting to correlate my experiences and others across the spectrum in order to understand my own form, fit and function in the world. I haven’t found any conversations with ‘God’ that dives as deep as the journey I’ve been on for most of my life. It’s a crazy one, though I wouldn’t change a thing.

From what I can tell, it isn’t a simulation; it is a collective experience, individuated to the extent of choice and free will, though the ‘holistic system’ (people and planet) is driven by the collective awareness, the planetary consciousness. Right now, obviously, the collective human level is low and it enjoys a fear-based reality for the most part; a dystopian reality of some sort most are afraid is coming to fruition.

Old Paradigms Need Shifting for a New Order to Emerge

Belief and projection aren’t all that different, imho, producing undesirable results around the world today. Most of it is still unconscious participation. It seems we’ve nearly lost our compassion and kindness toward each other from fear of infection, perceived differences and the narrative that’s indoctrinated a huge part of our society through the dominance of corporations and governments.

As with any statistical curve, the standard deviations are likely to apply, resulting in some with growing self-awareness that has led to awareness of a greater reality and some, not so much. Even though conversations about consciousness and non-human intelligence interacting have begun, we still tend to carry bias, imho, and it gets in the way of open communication. We’re rather attached to our own POV, not realizing it may be the same as another’s only the language is different so it is misunderstood.

Here’s an example:

Wilbert Smith’s book, The New Science, sheds some light on ‘their’ view of things. ‘Their’ meaning people from elsewhere. Apparently we do not understand ‘nothingness’ as a primary factor in the manifestation of everything, and that the materialization has to do with ‘spin’ design (an intelligence beyond our current understanding) that begins in a single point (Iikely of consciousness). In our history, some would have thought his experience was a conversation with God.

The level of interaction across inner and outer realms is astronomical when one considers the conversation with God to include creation itself; if we could only perceive it better. I shared that perspective in a recent video, from an ‘aha’ moment triggered by considering Smith’s information and how it validated some things for me. That is the notion that the point of light referenced above could also contain another aspect we missed. Through experiences of being in the ‘light’ and in the ‘void’ the sensations were nearly identical, individuated yet connected to everything somehow.

I don’t know, though I get the sense that we’re designed to become aware of it all as part of our evolution of consciousness, including the mind/brain interface, for lack of a better. We’ve got the equipment on board, in our brain/body/spirit/soul complex (from RA material model), and perhaps it is a matter of where we are looking to or from; dismantling with intellect or assembling through experience and observation, what Lex Neale’s diagram calls the Self-Aware Witness. Pretty cool stuff…

The New Science and Taking Life for a Spin around Self

Shaky Science with a little Spin around Self

I’m not an astrophysicist, but the idea of a ‘nothingness’ like Smith speaks of resembles the notion of the Void… from which all things come, or so we believe. This idea of nothingness is surely not understood because we really don’t have the language to describe it, yet if there are repeating patterns, fractals, in creation perhaps this is one that requires a spin around Self.

The entrance and exit within the door to the void within us, inside the tiny point of light of our soul consciousness, may reflect this same notion on a much smaller scale. We’re sorely lacking in our understanding of physics already, developing equations to account for anomalies instead of seeing the universe as anomaly-free and equating it.

We interpret the light from stars with our existing understanding, which may not be so. We think we have something and no longer question its validity, yet Smith notes that ‘people from elsewhere’ have a much different understanding of the nature of creation, and ours is in error.

Given that spin around self, and the assumption that Smith wasn’t fibbing, our questions for discovery may not have developed enough yet to fully comprehend what those structures we think are black holes really are and how they function. Seeing things at a distance makes it almost impossible to fully grok, imho.

There’s been more than one time I’ve been sucked down or into some kind of ‘tube’ that feels like a conduit of travel. I don’t know if it is inner space, outer space or a combination. It would seem that, all things functioning as ONE, that the combination is probably true. Experiencers, as some point, seem to corroborate such ‘trips’ although descriptions are different.<

I agree that the form doesn’t have much to do with it, and yet consciousness needs to have some form of manifestation for interaction to take place. For some time we’ve been experiencing a variety of mechanisms and styles of contact, not to mention various life forms. Some say we missed the idea of ‘nothing’ that is the foundation of everything.

Pick up the Phone, will ya?

We receive communication in ways we can understand it, for the most part, and it’s usually subjective and unique to the individual; a real spin around Self. I still think there are patterns we’re not seeing yet. Perhaps we weren’t ready to until recently where the spike in awareness, or the culmination of the calendars indicating an evolutionary leap is about ready to take place, has us at least looking for something more. Perhaps a primer that unlocks our understanding and increases our ability to manifest appropriately, from our nature instead of our intellect and science. The latter will catch up in time.

I’ll use the Urantia Book as a reference that at least offers the notion of considering a plethora of types of beings and responsibilities in universe administration. Neppe and Close say that consciousness, time and space are tethered across 9 dimensions. Smith says the ‘people from elsewhere’ relate that the tempic, magnetic and electric fields in the Quadrature Concept span 12 dimensions, all in the spin around Self, a point of observation. It seems consciousness is capable of experiencing all the above and the bridge between body/mind/spirit/soul is just now appearing.

What’s it all mean for us in a practical sense. I’m not sure, though I get the sense ‘they’ are trying to get us to understand that from nothing everything emerged in perfect order, there is a an order to nature and the cosmos we haven’t understood as natural order, which alludes to a natural order in human understanding as well.

We approach it from destructive testing, like CERN, where perhaps an approach from another direction is more appropriate; a simple change in perception that includes consciousness in the equation. I think we’re off to a good start, a silver lining in the Great Reset, perhaps.

Coming out of an ‘old’ normal and transforming into a ‘new’ normal might include a deeper check-in… Ponder your future well in your new spin around Self.

UFO Disclosure 2.0 – Understanding Our Place

Disclosure Has Happened?

The cat is out of the bag. UFO Disclosure has happened! The government and military officially announced they have a program to study Unidentified Aerial Phenomena; UFOs the more common term. So now what? Both Drs Steven Greer and James Fox released new movies from different perspectives on the phenomena. Where might that take us?

UFO DisclosureClose Encounters of the Fifth Kind: Contact Has Begun shares his work with CE5 techniques and that communication does take place, though there is nothing up close and interpersonal about it, and some would say about Greer. No one can deny his efforts to reveal ET is a non-threatening reality. The CE5 gatherings have grown to include ETLetsTalk.org‘s monthly worldwide CE5 events.

The Phenomenon goes into the history of UFO secrecy in the government as well as looking at a much broader perspective that included the school in Mozambique that was visited. The most striking comments of the film were the revelations of the children’s memories of their conversations. The take away, perhaps, is that we have a long way to go and there are possibilities we can explore.

So, What’s Next? What is a post Disclosure world like?

For years, the efforts of UFO Disclosure have been on just getting the government to admit UFOs exist and that they are aware of them, including having artifacts and craft. That cat is out of the bag now. It would seem a greater calling toward interaction would be the next step, right? Well, it doesn’t seem like we have done the things necessary to warrant interaction, which is why there has been none publicly and only a few experiencers have any regular engagements.

We really don’t know what, if any, kind of engagement the governments have had, though it is likely their behavior has not warranted open contact beyond a few early warnings in the 1950s. Those warnings also came through other channels, just in case the government and military didn’t share. The sad thing is we have not heeded them. We think we know better.

What we do know is that several attempts have been made to ‘communicate’ to our world that the atom is nothing to mess with, that we do not have enough knowledge about natural laws. The main theme seems to be about understanding natural laws. What are they? Where are they written? How can we understand them?

Russians to the Rescue

In our research we recently found a Russian author and highly respected scientist, Nicholai Levashov. In one of his books, The Final Appeal to Mankind, he included a message from Nicholas and Helena Roerich, of Agni Yoga fame, dictated in 1929. The following is just a portion of this message, though it makes the point for deciding on a collaborative destiny.

Levashov and the Roerichs were Russian. Americans segregate Russian activity still, as if they are an arch enemy, yet they are miles ahead of us in parapsychology and ufology. Americans think they are front-runners in this respect, yet Levashov’s history demonstrates quite a different story. The following message is consistent with experiencers today, so when are we going to really understand and engage our destiny?

UFO DisclosureThe Coalition Group Observers (a group of interdimensional beings) offered this through the Roerich’s: (excerpts)

Even your own observation, that different nations attach different meanings to those antithetical concepts is of no help to you. In the course of time, the very meanings themselves keep changing. Meanwhile you think of yourselves as a highly civilized race, yet in a court of law you apply a “yes” or “no” criterion to determine whether a verdict of guilt or innocence is appropriate for a single individual. Under no circumstances would such criteria be acceptable for determining the fate of a nation. But you permit the categorical principles of “yes” or “no” to dominate even there, turning virtually the entire planet into an enormous jail for all nations.

Moreover, your binary system of logic allows you to entrust the destiny of all nations and the entire human race to a handful of individuals. In international politics this is your idea of “a state of peace” or “a state of war” with abrupt shifts of logic. You think that this is perfectly natural, without even considering whether it is rational, and pursue it with a truly absurd tenacity. The latest world war and the new one about to happen, prove that your precipitous development of technology has not propelled you into wisdom.

…. (Real UFO Disclosure)

As one of possible means of help, the CGO can provide the human race with detailed descriptions of those civilizations, to be used as models for a new civilization. One of our major criteria for judging a race as intelligent is where every member elevates collective intelligence above all else. Consequently, man as an intelligent being must prioritize the development of the collective racial intelligence. The functions of man are as follows: harvest all information from previous generations, add whatever is newly acquired from experience and perception, then pass it on to the next generation, increased and improved.

Chaotic fluctuations in the movement of an intelligent society’s thought processes are necessary: after sifting through history one finds zigzags in the movement of thoughts that correspond to shifts in the changing objective picture of reality. The latter is unpredictable in direction, while the spectrum of thinking of any individual has a consistency during that individual’s life span. Hence it follows that each generation’s transformation is necessary not for the preservation and continuation of the species, but for preservation of their cumulative intelligence as a race of intelligent beings.

Therefore, considering the cosmic laws of Freedom of Will and Freedom of Choice, any hope you have that contact with extraterrestrial races will help to solve your ethical problems are groundless and impractical. The problem has a solution, but it is not what you think. Indeed, generally speaking it is not a problem at all. Moreover, we cannot offer the human race appropriate solutions, no matter how dire the situation might be, because each race has a right to decide its own destiny.

Vol I & II can be downloaded here.

We’re Really All One

UFO Disclosure brought us where? What this is all illustrating is that we still have options. We are not doomed, but we need to make some hard and fast choices as to how and what we will be toward each other and our world. The binary thinking isn’t working. Perhaps a tertiary method might. Three points determine spatial relationships, just as three aspects of self are primary – the head, the heart and the gut. Then there is the trinitized configurations of mind, body and spirit.

Of course the pioneers and wayshowers are small voices for a time, until the sense is made common through sharing systems and values that strongly represent the nature of our being and nurture the prospects within each other. We cannot fully understand it from the outside. We have to engage the ineffable with curiosity and fearlessness, and the truth shall set us free.

There are a lot of speculative notions as to how we are evolving at a genetic level, yet none refer to the integration of consciousness, or any dimension of it, as part of the process of biological evolution. We ought to know by now that nothing is separate. The holistic environment we live, move and have our being in is intricately interconnected and we continue to ignore it.

I am you and you are me and we are all together… It isn’t just a line from a song. The UFO Disclosure movement needs to step up. The petty self-centered ‘look at me’ types have distracted the public into nonsensical fantasies that have nothing to do with real life and living as a unified population – Our Destiny. It’s not a forced effort like some think. It evolves as a feeling, a sense of Being and a wholeness within.

Alas… a view we don’t want to acknowledge…

Your public and personal morals follow the same principles of polarizing ideas like “love—hate,” “good—evil,” “life—death,” and so on…

Even your own observation, that different nations attach different meanings to those antithetical concepts is of no help to you. In the course of time, the very meanings themselves keep changing. Meanwhile you think of yourselves as a highly civilized race, yet in a court of law you apply a “yes” or “no” criterion to determine whether a verdict of guilt or innocence is appropriate for a single individual. Under no circumstances would such criteria be acceptable for determining the fate of a nation. But you permit the categorical principles of “yes” or “no” to dominate even there, turning virtually the entire planet into an enormous jail for all nations.

Moreover, your binary system of logic allows you to entrust the destiny of all nations and the entire human race to a handful of individuals. In international politics this is your idea of “a state of peace” or “a state of war” with abrupt shifts of logic. You think that this is perfectly natural, without even considering whether it is rational, and pursue it with a truly absurd tenacity. The latest world war and the new one about to happen, prove that your precipitous development of technology has not propelled you into wisdom.

What is Non-human Intelligence?

A Question of Consciousness

Curious about non-human intelligence? First of all, the current state of affairs in our world might indicate humans aren’t as conscious or intelligent as we think. Even knowing we are interdependent on Earth, we still fail to get along. How can we perceive non-human intelligence with that kind of a background?

Central to that intelligence is making sense, which many of our current systems do not, including the massive confusion around the world right now. We have a dichotomy of belief systems and the cognitive dissonance in our society that proves we are challenged to follow any prudent path toward harmony.

On one side, a fear-based system about the command and control of resources lead by a small but powerful number of corporations and people. On the other side, a love-based system about learning how to create harmony among people and planet that fulfills an evolutionary path consistent with advancing intelligence that includes thousands, perhaps millions of people globally.

The former has little intelligence beyond understanding how to manipulate people, places and things. Manipulation doesn’t always have detrimental results. The latter operations take us to a new living awareness that engages an understanding of all things being connected, not necessarily knowing exactly how. It leads to studying systems and learning how they integrate best.

We’ve got the technology now that can share that information immediately and reach millions of people through social media networks. Perhaps our next step is a peer-to-peer collaborative information system able to store and serve up challenges and solutions in perfect timing for the next phase of our global village. To be able to position ourselves to look from this perspective I believe is imperative in order for us to have a sustainable future.

Organization Structure of Intelligence

non-human intelligenceNon-human intelligence would seem to include the ‘kingdoms’ of order, from the elemental to the universal. Non-human intelligent beings seem to have a holistic understanding of systems beyond anything humans can imagine. In the development of understanding, intellectual or spiritual paths, it becomes apparent that humans aren’t as high on the coexisting scale as we’d like to think. We seem to have misunderstood the ‘have dominion’ for ‘have control’ instead of ‘have good stewardship.’

It’s been our habit to condemn and/or destroy what we don’t understand or have never encountered. We’ve also allowed flora and fauna to become extinct as well as decimating habitats and ecosystems. It seems counter-intuitive to ‘intelligence’ and yet the pattern is and has been ubiquitous throughout humanity for millennia. Is it possible that non-human intelligence, in whatever form, might be intimately connected and humans, as ‘free will’ characters in the play, have just been afraid to explore that possibility without fear and with an open mind and heart?

A recent interview that Jaime Maussan, whom I’ve known for decades, did with Dr. Michio Kaku at the World UFO Congress in Barcelona, Spain revealed a new perspective on ‘disclosure’ and the burden of proof. Military videos released show that UFOs are indeed a reality. Now the ‘burden of proof’ is on the military and/or government to prove they are not real.

Dr. Kaku also goes into the Kardashev scale and notes that advanced civilizations would have technology that we probably would not be able to understand, let alone communicate with them in any kind of human ways we engage.

I had also written a blog post on frequency a couple of weeks prior to the event, noting the probability that Type III civilizations would more than likely use vastly different types of communication methods that were effectively ‘dumbed down’ in order for humans to be able to recognize the attempts.

I believe strongly that several methods are obvious, from the crop circles to the high frequency tones that most experiences report accompany their ‘contact’ events.

Reality-Based Vibrational Patterns

non-human intelligence

Click on image for full interview.

In an interview from August of 2018 with Dr. Jeffrey Mishlove, we explore the notion that these frequencies hold vast amounts of information.  An experienced meditator, for instance, is able to find repose in the silence within. In this same place there is a frequency that most are able to recognize, or at least acknowledge it is there in the background, underneath the visual or auditory display encountered during deep meditation.

It has been my limited experience that this frequency can be focused on and, as one does, another world opens on what we’ve called the ‘inner planes’ of consciousness. The experiences are non-linear and non-local, yet are often called ‘downloads’ because of the rapid-fire information exchange that occurs. Regardless of what the process is called, the events happen and people are not necessarily equipped to articulate the experience in any observational way.

Non-human intelligence across the gamut of types of civilizations and the many worlds we are told exist from the ancient texts and modern explorers has traditionally been kept and labeled in categories that severely limit its exploration, let alone open discussion without polarity paradigms. Perhaps as you read on this stigma and your own resistance to explore it in greater depth with dissipate or even dissolve. It really is a fascinating world to explore.

What is most challenging is stepping away from the traditional views of human intelligence and how it works. We think and act in linear fashion, with rare exceptions. Non-human intelligence seems to behave in non-linear and non- local ways which confound the mind because it has no way to process it.

However, with practices like meditation, this process can be at least be understood for how it works and the observer within begins to adjust to the new environment.

Like this article?
Leave a tip!





(We use PayPal but you don’t need an account with PayPal.)